Profitable Banks, Unprofitable Politics

I have an op-ed in today’s WSJ arguing that the government and opposition’s attacks on the banks are a pointless diversion. Saul Eslake makes similar arguments in today’s Age. After yesterday’s RBA Board minutes destroyed the politicians’ case against the banks, the best Joe Hockey can come up with is this:

Mr Hockey said the minutes had contemplated the banks going further than the official rise but didn’t contemplate the banks going as far as they did.

UPDATE: I have another op-ed in the Business section of The Australian.

posted on 17 November 2010 by skirchner in Economics, Monetary Policy, Politics

(3) Comments | Permalink | Main

Next entry: Don’t Blame Ben

Previous entry: The G20 and ‘Balanced’ Trade